Sample campaigns

Real briefs BriefAI shipped

Three hand-written campaigns — a TikTok Shop script, a UGC hook set, and a full marketing brief — plus the same one-sentence input (“I sell deodorant”) compared side-by-side against what ChatGPT and Syllaby return. Every example below comes from the same five-part bundle BriefAI ships in production.

TikTok Shop — sample output

Sample TikTok Shop script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

POV: you found a $14 lip gloss that feels like the $42 one — meet Velvet Hour.

Hook #2
Opener

Why is no one talking about the lip gloss that lasted through my 8pm dinner and my 11pm plans.

Hook #3
Opener

Three of my friends asked me what I was wearing on my lips this week and I had to just drop the link.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Close-up of the gloss wand pulling across a clean glass — voiceover: 'I found the gloss I keep re-buying, and it's under fifteen bucks.'
2. PROBLEM/STAKES (3–8s): Cut to a tired makeup drawer with three cracked wands; the voiceover says most 'clean' lip glosses either disappear in an hour or feel sticky.
3. SHOW, DON'T TELL (8–20s): Five-second side-by-side — a regular gloss smudges onto a coffee mug, the Velvet Hour formula beads off intact. Pull a tissue across both lips.
4. SOCIAL PROOF (20–30s): B-roll of three real DMs — three friends asking the same question, a customer comment pinned in the comments. Voiceover: 'Three of my friends asked me what this was this week.'
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (30–45s): On-screen proof points — nonsticky finish comparison, 8-hour wear photo, ingredient card. Voiceover addresses 'is under fifteen dollars actually clean?' with the angle on the formula.
6. CTA (45–60s): Hold the gloss next to a 'Tap the yellow basket to try the starter set' sticker. End on the wink.
Call to action
CTA

Tap the basket — the starter set ships today, and your first gloss is on us.

Objection handler
Concern

If you're tempted to scroll past because the price feels too low for a 'clean' gloss — fair. Most of what's under fifteen dollars isn't truly nonsticky, and most of what isn't sticky isn't actually clean. Velvet Hour is the line we kept coming back to: a nonsticky, eight-hour wear formula, transparent ingredient list, and the same lab our forty-two-dollar gloss gets made in. You can read the full INCI card in the listing before you tap basket. If it's not for you, the starter set has a thirty-day return — no restocking.

UGC hooks — sample output

Sample UGC hook — scroll-stopping opener written in seconds

Hook #1
Opener

The reason your UGC never lands is that the opener is selling, not stopping the scroll — try this instead.

Hook #2
Opener

Three creator friends asked me to write their hook this month. Two of them stopped filming before the second sentence.

Hook #3
Opener

If your hook doesn't pass one specific test, the algorithm buries it by minute three. Here's the test.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Cold open facing the camera with a pause — voiceover: 'Stop me if this sounds familiar: you record a hook, your friend says "it's fine," you post anyway, and it dies.'
2. THE FAILURE PATTERN (3–10s): Cut to a montage of three failed creator hooks — voiceover catalogs the three common mistakes (over-explaining, premature context, asking for the sell before earning the watch).
3. THE TEST FRAME (10–22s): On-screen graphic of a single question — 'Would they stop if it were a stranger, or only if it's a friend?' — followed by a worked example comparing two openers against the test.
4. THREE WORKED EXAMPLES (22–42s): A 4-second rewrites for each of the three creators' real TikTok openers; side-by-side text overlay; voiceover notes which beats survive stranger-test.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (42–52s): 'But my niche is too niche' — voiceover lands on a UGC-style creator in a tiny category with a strong, narrow hook vs. a generic broad hook, side-by-side retention.
6. CTA (52–60s): 'Drop your last three openers in the comments — I'll rewrite one for you this week.'
Call to action
CTA

Drop your last three openers below — I rewrite one creator a week for free.

Objection handler
Concern

If you're skeptical because you don't consider yourself a creator — fair. The hook frame works the moment the camera is on you, whether that's a product review, a tutorial, a vlog, or a one-shot promo for your own brand. The strangers-don't-stop-for-it test is the part most beginners miss: a friend will keep watching out of affection, the algorithm won't. Our generated hooks are designed to clear that bar each time, not to win a contest — if your hook doesn't land on a stranger, we rewrite it for you, no credits used.

Marketing brief — sample output

Sample marketing brief — positioning, hooks, and CTA in one

Hook #1
Opener

Most product briefs die in step two because the positioning was never written.

Hook #2
Opener

The single line of copy that turns a feature list into a launch plan — and why nobody writes it.

Hook #3
Opener

A marketing brief template is only worth saving if you can fill it in twenty minutes from an idea you just had.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Crossfade a founder at a wall of sticky notes versus a clipboard with three blank fields — voiceover: 'The reason your launch brief takes a week is you skipped twenty minutes of positioning.'
2. THE COST (3–9s): Cut to a calendar with three missed launch dates; voiceover names the cascade — assets commissioned on the wrong frame, channels picked before the message, no internal alignment on which segment.
3. THE POSITIONING LINE (9–24s): On-screen worked example — feature → benefit → tension → positioning line. Voiceover narrates each conversion step using a real product (running shoes that 'feel like nothing' for first-month marathoners).
4. ASSET MAPPING (24–40s): Side-by-side — a brief that names the positioning line generates matched hooks, CTAs, and objection handlers in minutes. The same brief with a different framing takes a week to rework.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (40–50s): 'But I already have a positioning doc' — voiceover addresses the case where the doc exists but isn't in the launch brief, and the cascade of misalignment that follows.
6. CTA (50–60s): On-screen: 'Type your product. Get the brief in 30 seconds.' End on the same wall of sticky notes, now covered.
Call to action
CTA

Type your product — get a full brief in thirty seconds, then decide what to ship.

Objection handler
Concern

If you're skeptical because you've seen a hundred brief templates and none of them survived contact with a real launch — fair. The difference here is that the position line is the FIRST field, not a 'you should fill this out later' note at the bottom. Every other field — the hook, the channel, the objection — is generated against that line. If the line is weak, the assets are weak, and the brief tells you so. The output is editable, not a sermon — start from the generated draft, sharpen the two lines that matter, ship the rest. Your first brief is on us.

Deodorant — sample output

Sample deodorant script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

Your old deodorant stops working by lunch — that's not sweat, that's a formula that's worn out.

Hook #2
Opener

The aluminum-free deodorant that actually lasts through a 5pm meeting is the one no one's telling you about.

Hook #3
Opener

I switched to a small-batch deodorant three months ago and the underarm rash I had for years is gone.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Extreme close-up of an underarm sweat patch blooming mid-afternoon — voiceover: 'Your deodorant gave up by lunch. Here's why.'
2. THE FAILURE (3–9s): Cut to a bathroom shelf with three half-used sticks; voiceover names the real reason natural deodorants quit — the baking-soda concentration is dialed down to avoid irritation, so it never reaches the day's third shirt.
3. THE FORMULA (9–22s): On-screen ingredient card — a balanced baking-soda base, a magnesium buffer, a sweat-neutralizing probiotic. Voiceover notes the ratio that keeps it gentle on skin all week and effective for twelve hours.
4. THE WEAR TEST (22–38s): Side-by-side — a standard natural deodorant at 11am versus the featured formula at 5pm. Voiceover pulls up the customer before/after on four shirts over a real work week.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (38–52s): 'But I switched once and it didn't work' — voiceover addresses the most common miss (too high a baking-soda concentration) and how the formula tunes it for sensitive skin without giving up the day.
6. CTA (52–60s): 'Tap basket. Starter trio ships today — try it for one work week, return it if it doesn't last.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap the basket — try the starter trio for one work week, full refund if it does not last.

Objection handler
Concern

If you're skeptical because you've tried three natural deodorants this year and quit every one — fair. The reason most natural sticks fail isn't your skin; it's the formula. Baking soda is what neutralizes odor, and brands that sell to sensitive customers tend to cut it back to almost nothing. The featured formula uses a low-irritant baking-soda base buffered with magnesium, holding twelve real hours on a workday without the rash most natural deodorants cause in week two. Try the starter trio for one full work week — if it doesn't last past your second shirt, return the unopened sticks for a full refund.

Supplements — sample output

Sample supplements script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

You bought the supplement from the podcast and stopped taking it two weeks later — that's the industry's most common outcome.

Hook #2
Opener

The supplement aisle is a $40 billion guessing game, and the one question that separates the ones that work is the one nobody asks.

Hook #3
Opener

A supplement routine is only worth keeping if you can tell what changed by week three — and most shelves fail that test.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Close-up of a pill bottle with the label blurred — voiceover: 'Sixty percent of the supplements people buy don't change anything measurable by week four.'
2. THE NOISE (3–10s): Cut to a bathroom shelf with eleven open bottles; voiceover names the failure pattern — buyers stack a new ingredient every month, no baseline, no test, no reason to keep taking any of them.
3. THE STACK FILTER (10–22s): Three-screen rule — bioavailability, dose relative to the studied amount, third-party tested certificate. Voiceover walks through a sample label and shows how to score it in sixty seconds.
4. THE 28-DAY TEST (22–40s): Side-by-side — a generic bottle bought for the ingredient and the featured brand's same-ingredient formula. Voiceover names the delta — third-party tested, dose-matched to the cited study, lower fill count so the price per effective serving is comparable.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (40–50s): 'But I've tried that brand before' — voiceover addresses the difference between a brand's flagship line and its reformulated clinical line, and how to tell which you actually bought.
6. CTA (50–60s): 'Tap basket. The four-week starter kit ships today, with a refill reminder tied to the calendar.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap basket — start the four-week kit, we send the refill reminder when the bottle empties.

Objection handler
Concern

If you dropped your last supplement because you couldn't tell if it was doing anything — you're not the customer who failed, the label was. The featured line writes the dose it targets on the front of the bottle (not the proprietary blend lock that hides it), batch-tests every lot for the amount actually in the pill, and publishes the certificate next to the lot number. If the bottle doesn't beat a four-week baseline of how you felt before, you can return the empty and the unopened bottles for a refund. No spreadsheet, no logging, no 2am forum dive — thirty days is enough if the formula is doing the work.

Pet products — sample output

Sample pet products script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

The chew toy your dog ignores after day two is the same one you paid twenty-four dollars for.

Hook #2
Opener

Most dog food brands spend more on the bag than on the recipe — and your dog can taste the difference.

Hook #3
Opener

Pet parents who care what their dog actually eats are the ones spending twice as much per bag — and saving the vet bill.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Slow-motion shot of a dog pushing a stuffed plush toy under the couch — voiceover: 'He smells the off-gassing on day two. He just can't tell you.'
2. THE GAP (3–10s): Cut to three popular chew toys with the stuffing ripped out; voiceover names the pattern — sellers use retail-shelf packaging optimized for shipping weight, not the actuation behavior dogs actually want.
3. THE TEST (10–22s): Side-by-side — a mass-produced plush versus the featured brand's natural-rubber squirrel. Voiceover logs forty dogs in a thirty-day trial and shows the median interest curve on a shared chart.
4. THE FOOD FRAUD (22–38s): On-screen ingredient list — three big-bags of dry food with the protein source ranked fourth or fifth. Voiceover names the 'kibble in pretty bag' pattern and shows the relevant bag's first three ingredients.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (38–50s): 'But my dog likes his current food' — voiceover addresses the simplest test: pour the current food and the sample food in two identical bowls, watch which one empties first.
6. CTA (50–60s): 'Tap basket. The first bag ships today; he tries it for thirty days, you keep the empty bag if he doesn't.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap basket — the first bag ships today, you keep the empty bag if your dog does not eat it.

Objection handler
Concern

If your last pet product felt like a twenty-four dollar gamble — you've bought the wrong category before, not the wrong brand. The featured line sources the rubber for the chew line from the same FDA-grade supplier the pediatric teether brands use, batch-logs every lot for off-gassing, and refunds the unchewed half if your dog won't engage with the toy inside the first week. The food line lists protein source as the first ingredient in every formula, ships in a kraft bag with a one-month freshness window, and refunds the unopened bags inside thirty days. If the dog doesn't finish the first bag, neither do you. That's the only test that matters.

Skincare — sample output

Sample skincare script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

The serum you bought last month is the same kind of bottle that lived on your shelf for six months before it — and you still can't tell why.

Hook #2
Opener

A skincare routine is only worth the time if it changes something visible by week four, and most shelves fail that test for one boring reason.

Hook #3
Opener

The bottle that costs eighty-eight dollars and the one that costs fourteen dollars almost always do the same thing — here's how to tell the ones that don't.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Close-up of a bathroom shelf with eight open bottles — voiceover: 'Most of what's on this shelf is doing nothing measurable.'
2. THE FAILURE (3–10s): Cut to a half-used niacinamide bottle and a half-used retinol bottle; voiceover names the pattern — buyers rotate a new product every few weeks because the previous one didn't move the needle.
3. THE FORMULATION CHECK (10–22s): Three-screen rule — active ingredient first, clinical concentration published on the label, no fragrance or essential oils listed. Voiceover walks through a real label.
4. THE 28-DAY COMPARISON (22–40s): Side-by-side — a prestige serum and the featured formula at a ten percent share of the price. Voiceover logs the niacinamide-vs-retinol concentration comparison on screen.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (40–50s): 'But I have sensitive skin' — voiceover addresses the most common over-percentage mistake (a too-high retinol percent that causes irritation without results) and what the formulation's two-step ladder does instead.
6. CTA (50–60s): 'Tap basket. The 28-day routine ships today — return the unused serums if the routine doesn't move the needle.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap basket — start the 28-day routine, return the unused bottles if nothing changes by week four.

Objection handler
Concern

If you've quit three different serums in the last year — fair. Most bottles fail because the active ingredient is dosed too low to do anything, or so high it stings. The featured line publishes the percent of every active on the label, batch-tests every lot for the concentration that actually ships in the bottle, and ships a 28-day routine built around a two-step ladder (a low-dose entry, a slightly higher-dose second month). If the routine doesn't move the needle on the four-week photo, the unused bottles come back for a refund. No more guessing which bottle on the shelf is doing the work.

Fitness — sample output

Sample fitness script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

The workout plan you abandoned at week two is the same one your friends abandoned at week two — and the problem isn't motivation.

Hook #2
Opener

You do not need a sixty-minute workout to make the next two months visible — you need a thirty-minute workout you will actually repeat.

Hook #3
Opener

A gym routine is only worth keeping if it survives a real Friday, and most plans fail that test by week three.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Cut to a phone calendar with four abandoned 6am gym blocks — voiceover: 'The plan quit you, not the other way around.'
2. THE FAILURE (3–10s): Montage of three abandoned routines — split-week programs, 75-minute full-body sessions, week-five progressive overload that nobody finishes. Voiceover names the common factor: structural time cost higher than the available hour.
3. THE 30-MINUTE FRAME (10–22s): On-screen a single rack of dumbbells and a timer — voiceover walks through a 30-minute full-body session calibrated for a 9pm window after the kids are down.
4. THE FRIDAY TEST (22–40s): Side-by-side — a 60-minute plan the calendar refused to keep versus the 30-minute session repeated eight Fridays in a row. Voiceover notes the missed-weekday delta.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (40–50s): 'But I want to lift heavy' — voiceover addresses the trade-off between a heavy plan nobody finishes and a moderate plan repeated four times a week, with the recovery math from a real twelve-week log.
6. CTA (50–60s): 'Tap basket. The first month ships today; we send the next session when you log the last one.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap basket — start month one, the next session ships when you log the last one.

Objection handler
Concern

If you gave up on your last plan because the third week canceled your gym block and the plan never recovered — that's not discipline, that's a calendar mismatch. The featured program is built for the 30-minute window that survives a real Friday: warmup, three compound sets, three accessories, written cooldown. Twelve weeks of programming on a four-day schedule, with the option to swap any day and ship the next session when you log the last rep set. If the month one plan doesn't survive a real Friday, return it inside thirty days and the next session never ships.

Coffee — sample output

Sample coffee script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

Your morning ritual costs you nothing extra — just the same bag of beans you've been buying since 2021.

Hook #2
Opener

Specialty coffee is only worth the markup if the difference survives a blind taste test, and most bags of beans fail that test against the bag your friend kept this year.

Hook #3
Opener

The single detail that separates a great single-origin from the bag your office keeps is one — and most coffee brands don't print it on the label.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Pour-over close-up — voiceover: 'Same drip, same kettle, completely different coffee for the same price as your morning refill.'
2. THE NOISE (3–10s): Cut to a tray of supermarket bags with origin stamps blurred; voiceover names the pattern — most bags buy commodity beans and then front-load the marketing on the price per cup.
3. THE FRESHNESS RULE (10–22s): On-screen printed roast date plus origin lot number — voiceover notes the rule: coffee bags printed with a roast date brew a tighter cup than bags printed with a 'best by' date eighteen months out.
4. THE BLIND TEST (22–38s): Side-by-side — a name-brand bag versus the featured small-batch roast, in identical unmarked cups. Voiceover logs the difference on a 12-person blind panel.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (38–50s): 'But roast date costs more' — voiceover addresses the price-per-cup math: the featured bag is $22, ships roasted within seven days, and lands at less than a dollar per cup over the month.
6. CTA (50–60s): 'Tap basket. First bag ships today, roasted within seven days.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap basket — first bag roasted within seven days, ships today, refund if the cup does not beat your last.

Objection handler
Concern

If you're skeptical because your office already switched twice this year — fair. The difference here is that every bag ships with the roast date printed on the bag (not a 'best by' eighteen months out), bound to a specific origin lot, and roasted within seven days of leaving the roaster. The price lands at under a dollar per cup over a month. If the cup doesn't beat your last bag in a blind taste, we refund the unopened bag and send the next roast free. That's the only test that separates a real specialty roaster from a supermarket bag with a logo on it.

Candles — sample output

Sample candle script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

The candle that costs you forty-eight dollars smells like nothing in twenty minutes — that's not your nose, that's a wick that's too small for the wax pool.

Hook #2
Opener

A candle is only worth keeping if it fills the room before it burns halfway, and most candles fail that test for one boring engineering reason.

Hook #3
Opener

A small-batch soy candle still costs less per hour than the chain-store candle you keep rebuying — the math is on the back of the label.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Close-up of a candle flame in a glass with a half-melted wax pool — voiceover: 'This is the wick actually failing your candle. Here's the fix.'
2. THE FAIL (3–10s): Cut to a candle that burned out the scent in twenty minutes; voiceover names the pattern — retailers spec a wick that fits the jar, not a wick that fully melts the wax pool.
3. THE WICK TEST (10–22s): On-screen a side-by-side — a chain-store candle and a small-batch soy candle both at hour two, with the wax pool depth charted in centimeters. Voiceover highlights the half-inch difference that drives the throw rate.
4. THE THROW (22–38s): Side-by-side — the same square footage in two rooms, candle A burning in one, candle B in the other. Voiceover logs how many minutes until the scent reaches the doorway.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (38–50s): 'But I can't tell the difference' — voiceover addresses the simplest test: light the candle on hour one, walk out of the room for ten minutes, walk back, and rate the room on a one-to-five scale.
6. CTA (50–60s): 'Tap basket. First candle ships today; return it if the throw doesn't fill your room.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap basket — first candle ships today, return it if the throw does not fill your room by minute ten.

Objection handler
Concern

If you burned three candles this year that quit on you — fair. The reason most candles fail isn't the scent, it's the engineering. The wick is sized to fit the glass jar for shipping and retailer display, not to fully melt the wax pool for the scent throw. The featured line is small-batch soy, ships with a wick sized to the actual wax pool depth, and labels every candle with the hour-by-hour throw distance in a real 18-foot room. If the first candle doesn't fill the room by minute ten, return the unburned candle and the next jar ships free.

Jewelry — sample output

Sample jewelry script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

The three-hundred-dollar necklace that turned green in four weeks is the same alloy your friend sold you as 'gold-filled' last year.

Hook #2
Opener

Jewelry for daily wear is a different math than jewelry for a box — and most of what you're being sold online is sold for the second market at the first math.

Hook #3
Opener

A jewelry line is only worth keeping if you can wear it in the shower for six months without the green ring — and most lines fail that test by week two.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Extreme close-up of a green ring on a finger where a ring was — voiceover: 'Three hundred dollars and four weeks. That's the alloy.'
2. THE GAP (3–10s): Cut to a tray of 'gold-filled' and 'gold-plated' jewelry; voiceover names the pattern — plating wears through in weeks, gold-fill lasts months, and the price difference is closer than sellers admit.
3. THE TEST (10–22s): On-screen the difference between solid gold, gold-fill, gold-plate, and vermeil — voiceover walks through the micron thickness shown on the receipt.
4. THE SHOWER TEST (22–38s): Side-by-side — a gold-plated necklace at week three versus a 14k solid-gold chain at month three. Voiceover logs no green ring on the second at week twelve.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (38–50s): 'But solid gold is too expensive' — voiceover addresses the difference between solid-gold fine jewelry and the gold-fill daily-wear line, and why the gold-fill math wins for pieces you actually wear.
6. CTA (50–60s): 'Tap basket. First piece ships today; we replace the chain if the green ring shows up in month one.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap basket — first piece ships today, the chain is on us if the green ring shows up in month one.

Objection handler
Concern

If the last necklace you bought online left a green ring on your neck by week four — fair. The line you bought was likely gold-plated, sold at the price of a daily-wear piece. The featured jewelry line is gold-fill daily-wear (a real micron-thickness bonded layer, not a flash of plate), shipped with the alloy layer noted on the receipt, and warranted against the green-ring test for six months of shower-and-sleep wear. If the green ring shows up in month one, the chain is on us. That's the only test that separates a real gold-fill line from a plated import sold as fine jewelry.

Hair care — sample output

Sample hair care script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

The split ends you're still seeing in month two are the same split ends your last three products promised to fix — and the shampoo bottle is the easiest place to look.

Hook #2
Opener

A hair routine is only worth keeping if it survives a real week of heat-styling, and most lines fail that test for one ingredient you can read on the back of the bottle.

Hook #3
Opener

You don't need a twelve-step hair routine — you need a four-step routine built around the one ingredient your hair actually responds to.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Close-up of split ends under a hand lens — voiceover: 'These split ends are not your hair. They're your last shampoo's sulfates.'
2. THE GAP (3–10s): Cut to three open bottles on a shower shelf; voiceover names the failure pattern — sulfate-heavy daily shampoo, silicone-heavy conditioner that weighs the curl down, and a heat protectant applied after the damage is already done.
3. THE FOUR-STEP ROUTINE (10–22s): On-screen shampoo, conditioner, leave-in, oil — voiceover walks through the four-step routine tuned to wavy-to-curly hair.
4. THE WEEK TEST (22–40s): Side-by-side — a generic three-step routine and the featured four-step routine over a seven-day window. Voiceover logs the split-end delta on a daily photo log.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (40–50s): 'But my hair is fine, not curly' — voiceover addresses the same four-step routine tuned to fine-straight hair, with the oil replaced by a heavier leave-in to avoid the weighed-down effect.
6. CTA (50–60s): 'Tap basket. First set ships today; refund the unused bottles if the routine doesn't move the photo log.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap basket — first set ships today, refund the unused bottles if the four-step does not move the photo log.

Objection handler
Concern

If you tried three new shampoos last year and your split ends stayed where they were — fair. The reason most hair routines fail isn't the shampoo, it's the layering. Sulfate-heavy daily cleanser, a silicone conditioner, a styling product applied after the cuticle is already rough — that's a routine rebuilding the damage it just removed. The featured four-step routine is built around one ingredient (the leave-in) that survives heat-styling for the rest of the week. If the photo log doesn't move in thirty days, the unused bottles come back for a refund. No more twelve-step chase through the same three-month routine.

Sleep & wellness — sample output

Sample sleep & wellness script — 60s shop video ready to film

Hook #1
Opener

The three-hundred-dollar mattress you bought last year didn't fix your sleep — and it won't, because the lever isn't the bed, it's the hour before it.

Hook #2
Opener

A wind-down routine is only worth keeping if it survives a real Tuesday night, and most bedtime routines fail that test for one small reason nobody talks about.

Hook #3
Opener

You do not need a sleep supplement — you need a fifty-minute wind-down that survives a real calendar week.

Script outline
60s script
1. HOOK (0–3s): Slow-motion shot of a phone screen lit at midnight — voiceover: 'The lever isn't your mattress. It's the hour before you lie down.'
2. THE GAP (3–10s): Cut to three bedroom routines — supplements, white noise, weighted blankets; voiceover names the failure pattern — buyers stack a new tool every week, no wind-down hour, no consistent schedule.
3. THE WIND-DOWN HOUR (10–22s): On-screen the four anchors — phone outside the room, low light, calm temperature, one non-screen task. Voiceover walks through a fifty-minute pre-sleep routine.
4. THE WEEK TEST (22–40s): Side-by-side — a random bedtime with no wind-down versus the four-anchor routine across a real week. Voiceover logs the time-to-sleep and wake-stamina difference.
5. OBJECTION HANDLER (40–50s): 'But white noise works for me' — voiceover addresses the line between a tool that masks noise and a routine that addresses the room. Same tool, different position in the hour.
6. CTA (50–60s): 'Tap basket. The wind-down starter kit ships today; return the unused pieces if the routine doesn't move the time-to-sleep in week two.'
Call to action
CTA

Tap basket — wind-down starter kit ships today, refund unused pieces if the routine does not move your week-two time-to-sleep.

Objection handler
Concern

If you've tried three different sleep supplements this year and quit every one — fair. The lever isn't the supplement, it's the wind-down hour. The featured wind-down starter kit ships the four anchors of a real night — a low-light lamp, a room thermometer, a phone-out-of-room tray, and a one-task card — with the routine written for week one and the upgrade routine written for week two. If the time-to-sleep doesn't move in the second week, return the unused pieces for a refund. No more stacking tools on a routine that wasn't built yet.

Compare BriefAI output to ChatGPT and Syllaby side-by-side

Side-by-side

How BriefAI stacks up

Feature
BriefAI
ChatGPT
Syllaby
PricingWhat one marketing bundle actually costs the buyer.
Built here

Free, $29/mo brief, $79/mo pro

Free tier caps at 2 briefs/month; Brief at $29/mo unlocks 30 briefs plus plain-text export; Pro at $79/mo unlocks 200 briefs, the saved library, shareable export, and a VA seat.

Generic assistant
$20/mo (ChatGPT Plus)

OpenAI's standard paid tier — faster response times, GPT-4o access, and higher usage limits than the free tier; billed per user, monthly.

Long-form AI
Syllaby Basic

Syllaby's entry tier aimed at solo creators — confirm the current headline price on syllaby.com/pricing/ during the next refresh cycle.

Output scopeWhat the tool hands back after one prompt.
Built here

Five structured pieces, ready to ship

Three hooks, a numbered 60-second script outline, a one-line CTA, and an objection handler — every brief is the same five-part bundle, so downstream templates stay stable.

Generic assistant
Operator to confirm
Free-form assistant reply

Operator to confirm — ChatGPT returns a single conversational response unless you wire a custom GPT or a structured-output schema.

Long-form AI
Operator to confirm
Long-form AI articles + social posts

Operator to confirm — Syllaby is positioned around scheduled long-form articles and social posts, not the hook/script/CTA bundle that fits a launch draft.

Time-to-outputHow long from typing to having a draft you can read.
Built here

~30 seconds

Type a one-sentence product description, submit, get the full bundle in under a minute. No prompt-engineering loop, no brittle template editing between rounds.

Generic assistant
Operator to confirm
Minutes, prompt-by-prompt

Operator to confirm — best case is the first edit cycle; typical is several back-and-forth turns before the structure matches the brief you wanted.

Long-form AI
Operator to confirm
Minutes per article

Operator to confirm — the workflow is an article at a time with topic + outline inputs before the AI writes.

Pricing tiers

Every sourced plan
ChatGPT Plus and the three Syllaby tiers — pulled from config/competitor_pricing.json. Refresh cadence: every 48 hours.
  • ChatGPT plus$20/mo (ChatGPT Plus)

    OpenAI's standard paid tier — faster response times, GPT-4o access, and higher usage limits than the free tier; billed per user, monthly.

  • Syllaby basicSyllaby Basic

    Syllaby's entry tier aimed at solo creators — confirm the current headline price on syllaby.com/pricing/ during the next refresh cycle.

  • Syllaby standardSyllaby Standard

    Syllaby's mid tier — confirm the current headline price and credit allotment on syllaby.com/pricing/ during the next refresh cycle.

  • Syllaby premiumSyllaby Premium

    Syllaby's top tier — confirm the current headline price and credit allotment on syllaby.com/pricing/ during the next refresh cycle.

Same one-sentence input

What each tool does with “I sell deodorant

Type the chip-text into BriefAI, ChatGPT, or Syllaby. Each tool returns something structurally different — here’s exactly what comes back.

Chip input
I sell deodorant

I sell deodorant — natural, no-aluminum, for people who care what they put on their skin.

BriefAI bundle
Five pieces, one prompt
Built here

Three hooks, ready to ship

Hook #1
60s ready

POV: you stopped sweating through your white t-shirts after one swap — meet the natural deodorant that actually holds up.

Hook #2
60s ready

There's a reason three of my friends switched this month, and it's not the scent or the packaging.

Hook #3
60s ready

Why I stopped believing the "natural deodorant doesn't work" line — one ingredient swap, two weeks in.

ChatGPT reply
Free-form conversational reply
Generic assistant

Free-form assistant reply

A prompt-by-prompt back-and-forth: you ask for hooks, get a list of ten, narrow the tone, ask for a script outline, rewrite the opening three times. Total elapsed: several minutes, no stable structure across rounds.

Syllaby article
Long-form SEO article
Long-form AI

Long-form AI article

A 700-word SEO article titled something like "5 Natural Deodorants Worth Buying in 2026" with an outline you set up top: intro, list of picks, comparison table, comparison CTA. Useful for the blog, not for the launch video.